Awards and Honors
Martindale Hubbell - AV rated lawyer - Best Rating Possible
Multi-Million Dollar Advocates Forum
AVVO Top Rated Personal Injury Attorney, 10 of 10
ATLA Top 100
Lawyers.com - Rated 5.0 out of 5.0 - Top Rating Possible
National Trial Lawyers - Top 100 Trial Lawyers
Million Dollar Advocates Forum
American Society of Legal Advocates - Top 100 - 2014
Marquis' Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in America and Who's Who in American Law
AVVO Clients' Choice Personal Injury Lawyer
American Society of Legal Advocates - Top 100 - 2013
Hawaii Accident News -
New Articles and Comment
The following articles are articles of interest in the
personal injury and accident field. Some may show similarity to your
situation, but each case is individual and must be evaluated
on its own facts. Please feel free to peruse these articles.
For older archived news items please review this page: Archived News Items - Hawaii Accident News
In Muniz v. UPS (9th Cir., Dec 2013), a case under a statute awarding attorneys fees and costs to the prevailing party, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a trial court award of attorneys fees and costs which was 26x the damages awarded by the jury. Decisions like this one should help to deter the time-wasting shotgun litigation tactics of insurers under such statutes (such as HRS section HRS 431:10-242). A pdf of the case can be found here: Muniz v. UPS, attorneys fees of 26x damages awarded
In Dorn v. Burlington N. Santa Fe R.R., No. 03-35071 (9th Cir. Feb. 7, 2005), the the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals found that hedonic damages testimony by economic experts in personal injury cases is admissible in Federal Court.
Two Hawaii Circuit Court Judges have found that auto PIP insurers who unilaterally pick a defense medical examiner (IME) for a medical records review violate H.R.S. 431:10C-308.5, which requires that a medical reviewer (so-called IME doctor) be chosen by agreement or by a neutral forum in PIP cases. Benefit denials based upon such medical reports are improper and invalid.
Our Hawaii doctors and medical providers have prevailed in the case of Orthopedic Associates v. HIG (Haw. Sup. Ct. 12-7-05). In that case the Hawaii Supreme Court ruled that many auto insurers have failed to comply with statutory denial and notice requirements when they "down-coded" tens of thousands of medical bills owed to doctors for treatment arising out of motor vehicle accidents.
A consumer group which watches the insurance industry has determined that insurance companies padded their losses by 50% or so when reporting them to state regulators - conduct calculated to gain regulatory approval for excessively hiking malpractice premiums. During a 9 year study from 1986 to 1994 the industry reported to regulators losses of $39.6 billion but actually paid only $26.7 billion. The losses were overstated by approximately 50% over the nine year period.
A Hawaii man was awarded $16M in a failed seatbelt case - Friday, December 23, 2005. In the case of Udac v. Takata Corp - a Big Island jury has awarded a 26-year-old Naalehu man, who is now a paraplegic, more than $16 million in connection with a single-car accident in 2000 against the manufacturer of a defective seatbelt.
A South Dakota court awarded $65,000 in compensatory damages and $ 5,000,000 in punative damages against an employer involved in wrongfully disputing a worker's compensation claim In the case of Hubbard v. Hills Materials - Ron Hubbard, a construction laborer, needed $5,998 in medical treatment for carpal tunnel injuries brought on by his work. When the smoke cleared the employer was ordered to pay a $5.0 million penalty for wrongfully stonewalling his Worker's Comp claim.
Dominic Peressini, age 39, is a former University of Colorado math professor who was recently awarded $3.0 million awarded for insurer bad faith. Under his insurer's business plan, Dominic Peressini's brain injuries, mangled arm and post-accident memory and cognitive problems were too expensive - so they were rejected. After years of struggle through the courts, in November 2005 Mr. Peressini was awarded nearly $3 million because the disability insurer should have placed its obligations to its policyholders above its own profit goals.
Three mainland Abuse of Process cases have addressed the situation where insurance carriers have used the expenses and delay of litigation to drive plaintiffs/claimants into the ground. This is a common insurance company tactic here in Hawaii as well as on the mainland. For more information please visit the Hawaii Insurance Bad Faith Lawyer - Attorney page and scroll down to the lower part of that page to the section entitled "Insurance Company Bad Faith in Hawaii".
Experts at Children's Hospital in Boston have reported that when the cerebrum is injured in an infant, the cerebellum may fail to grow to a normal size - which can have a major impact on development of motor coordination, behavior and even cognition. The two structures appear to modulate each other's growth and development in the infant.
Boilerplate Discovery Responses may be Dangerous in the 9th Circuit. In the case of Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Company v. United States District Court for the District of Montana, 408 F.3d 1142 (9th Cir. 2005) the Ninth Circuit held that boilerplate objections for blanket refusals inserted into a response to a Rule 34 request for production of documents are insufficient to assert a privilege.
Insurers who insist on using biased medical examiners in an effort to routinely deny insurance benefits to injured people may want to consider Hangarter v. Provident Life and Accident Ins. Co., 373 F.3d 998, 1010-1011 (9th Cir. 2004). In that case the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals found that Provident repeated use of the same medical examiner constituted evidence of bad faith on the part of the carrier and may give rise to an action for bad faith against the insurance carrier.
In the case of WILSON v. AIG, October 28, 1998, the Hawaii Supreme Court held that under Hawaii's no-fault (PIP) law - in most cases only the medical provider (and not the patient) can bring an action against the insurer to compel non-payment of the medical bills. This case needs to be reversed by legislation so that insureds can enforce the policy that they bought!
Since 2000 we have had some of the deadliest car accidents in Hawaii's history:
* March 1, 2005: Two people were killed and one critically injured in a two-vehicle collision on Kunia Road near the Hawaii Country Club.
* May 26, 2004: A Japanese tourist was killed and seven other people injured, one critically, when a pickup truck drove onto the sidewalk in Waikiki along Kalakaua Avenue near Kaiulani Avenue and slammed into a crowd of people near the Moana Surf Rider Hotel.
* February 13, 2004: Four people were killed and two others injured when two cars involved in a street race slammed into the rear of a flat-bed truck preparing the zipper lane on H1 Freeway.
* December 10, 2003: Four young people - ages 18 to 24 - died in a two-car crash resulting from a street race on Farrington Highway in Makaha.
* March 18, 2003: Five males, ages 13 to 37, were killed about 1:30 a.m. on Kamehameha Highway in Haleiwa when their car hit a tree while speeding.
Pacific Business News - Thursday 9/23/2005 News of the 18.2% drop in WC claims costs in the reporting period for 2003 (reported on Thursday 9/23/2005 by the Pacific Business News) - totally contradicts the entire gutting of WC system that the Abercrombie administration, the DCD and the LIRB have tried to railroad through our state. It shows that this poorly conceived so-called "Work Comp Reform" was not needed to keep the system viable and was actually a political payoff thrown to big business and insurance companies (at the expense of the average working person in the state of Hawaii). Politics can be ugly.
Wrongful death lawsuits target Taser stun gun use - Thursday, Oct. 7 2005 - Las Vegas Review-Journal - In Nevada a multimillion-dollar lawsuit was filed on behalf of a Las Vegas family whose son died after police used a Taser stun gun to subdue him. The stun gun was manufactured by Taser International. This action is likely to be followed by many more as the dangers with such stun guns appear to far exceed the representations made by the manufacturers of such stun guns.
Merck's Vioxx and related New England Journal of Medicine articles
Has Merck & Co.'s Vioxx been properly described in New England Journal of Medicine articles or has yet another medical industry-backed study suppressed the whole truth?
Costco Wholesale case resolves Jim Krueger's large judgment on Maui against Costco Wholesale is finally resolved, July, 2005
Wisconsin Med Mal Cap Unconstitutional Wisconsin's cap on non-economic damages in medical malpractice cases is held unconstitutional by the highest court in Wisconsin, July, 2005
Expert testimony on hedonic damages The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals addresses the exclusion by a U.S. District Court in Montana of expert witness testimony from a defense expert on hedonic damages (loss of enjoyment of life damages), Feb. 7, 2005
Two teens in hospital following hit and run on McCully
By Dan Nakaso, Sunday, March 6, 2005
Advertiser Staff Writer
The "McDonald's Coffee Case" And Other Fictions
-undated- from the American Center for Justice and Democracy
Review of court records shows no dramatic increase in civil lawsuits
By Tallahassee Democrat- Fri, Mar. 25, 2005
Kaimuki House Fire Leaves 2 Women Dead
-March 24, 2005 from KITV TheHawaiiChannel.com
Houston, Texas- oil refinery blast death toll- March 24, 2005
By AP, AFP, www.smh.com.au © March 24, 2005
An Analysis of Fatal Large Truck Crashes
By the US Dept of Transportation- National Highway Traffic Safety Administration
National Center for Statistics and Analysis- June 2003
Do it yourself Tort Reform for medical treatment (for those parents who support so-called Tort Reform)
Kaiser's liability challenged for drug's role in Jerry Wilson's auto accident with youth pedestrian in downtown Honolulu
By Rod Ohira- Star Bulletin, March 8, 2000
Cellular Phone Radiation: Appeals Court To Hear Oral Argument In Health Suit Sept. 26, 2003
by Jeffrey Silva, Aug. 20, 2003
Brain injuries, the "silent epidemic"
by 1personalinjurylawyers.com December 7, 2004
Annual Report of the Center for Alternative Dispute Resolution State of Hawaii - Judiciary, June 20, 2004
Slain rampaging elephant- Tyke- left tenuous legacy in animal rights and
people's lives . (2004-08-20)
Closing roads after accidents routine
(Discusses H1 Freeway closures for accident investigation)
By Peter Boylan, February 13, 2005
Advertiser Staff Writer
Resolving insurance hassles trumps tort reform on Oklahoma medical association agenda
by the Associated Press / January 19, 2005
Each article is provided with links to its source from the
media. Whereever possible, the original article link or
the link to the media organization
is included with the article so that (1) credit is given to the
proper authors and media outlet and (2) the user of this site
can have immediate access with the media outlet in order to sign
up for their news service. Please avail yourself
of this opportunity.
Here are some places to find more information about PI:
Honolulu Injury Lawyer HI
Honolulu Wrongful Death Lawyer HI
Honolulu Attorney | HI Lawyer
you have suffered serious injuries as the result of an
accident in Hawaii, please feel free to contact
Accident Lawyer Hawaii now for a free evaluation of your case.
Accident Lawyer Hawaii
Law Office of
William H. Lawson
1188 Bishop St. Suite 2902
Honolulu, HI 96813
New client hotline:
Pearl City, Aiea and Waipahu:
Main business phone:
Directions to Honolulu office
HI accident news
Court cases re:
Hawaii accident law
Products Liability - Cases & Comment
Jones Act- maritime law and seaman cases
The Constitution Of The State Of Hawaii
Recent Personal Injury and Car Accident News
Future damages can be hard to prove in a personal injury case. But, nonetheless, the Hawaii courts hold that future damages may be awarded where there is competent medical testimony to demonstrate a future loss (such as a permanent injury or future complications, disability, limitations or pain and suffering). But supporting medical testimony is critical. "We have held that where the issue as to permanency of an injury or as to future pain or suffering is subjective in character, there must be competent expert opinion testimony as to the permanency of an injury or as to future pain and suffering before a jury may be permitted to consider such damages." Bachran v. Morishige, 469 P.2d 808, 813 (Haw. 1970)