|
Home- Accident Lawyer Hawaii
General Info
What is a Personal Injury Claim? (basic)
Do I Need an Accident Lawyer?
Finding an Accident Lawyer in Hawaii
Get Legal Help at Accident Lawyer Hawaii
Maui, Kauai, Lanai & Big Island Injuries
Preparing a Claim or Case After an Injury
About Accident Lawyer Hawaii- Attorney Wm Lawson
Insurance Coverage for Injuries - Hawaii
Accidents (except MVAs)
Defective products liability - Hawaii
Ocean, boating & maritime accidents - Hawaii
Construction & equipment accidents - Hawaii
Recreational accidents - Hawaii
Electrical accidents - Hawaii
Elevator accidents - Hawaii
Explosion accidents - Hawaii
Insurance Claims and Bad Faith - Hawaii
Medical & professional malpractice - Hawaii
Dog bites, animal attacks - Hawaii
Swimming pool accidents - Hawaii
Fall accidents- Trip, slip, etc. - Hawaii
Types of Injury
Brain & Head Injuries - Hawaii
Spinal Cord Injuries- SCI - Hawaii
Catastrophic injury claims - Hawaii
Wrongful death claims - Hawaii
Broken bone injuries - Hawaii
Burn accidents (Fire or Chemical) - Hawaii
Drowning accidents - Hawaii
Disc | Disk injuries - Hawaii
Motor Vehicle Accidents
Car accidents - Hawaii
Drunk driver accidents - Hawaii
Truck and bus accidents - Hawaii
Moped and pedestrian accidents - Hawaii
Auto claims and insurance - Hawaii
Motorcycle claims & insurance - Hawaii

American Trial Lawyers Association

Consumer Lawyers Hawaii

Stanford Law School

American Bar Association

Marquis' Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in America and Who's Who in American Law
Sister sites:
Accident Lawyer Hawaii Attorney -
Car Accident Lawyer Hawaii -
Injury Lawyer Attorney Hawaii -
|
|
|
JONES ACT- TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Jones Act - Cases, Decisions and Opinions
I. IN GENERAL -> C. Applicability to Foreign Ships, Seamen, and Occurrences -> 3. Nationality or Ownership of Vessel -> a. In General
55. Law of the flag
If law of flag is to control in action under 46 USCS Appx § 688, flag must not be one merely of convenience but should be bona fide. Southern Cross S.S. Co. v Firipis (1960, CA4 Va) 285 F2d 651, 84 ALR2d 895, cert den 365 US 869, 5 L Ed 2d 859, 81 S Ct 903 and (disagreed with Swain v Isthmian Lines, Inc. (CA3 Pa) 360 F2d 81 (disagreed with Chung, Yong Il v Overseas Navigation Co. (CA11 Ala) 774 F2d 1043, reh den, en banc (CA11 Ala) 779 F2d 60 and reh den, en banc (CA11 Ala) 779 F2d 60 and cert den (US) 90 L Ed 2d 346, 106 S Ct 1802)) and (disapproved on other grounds Griffin v Oceanic Contractors, Inc., 458 US 564, 73 L Ed 2d 973, 102 S Ct 3245, on remand (CA5 Tex) 685 F2d 139).
Law of flag would not be accorded controlling weight in determining 46 USCS Appx § 688 jurisdiction where vessel involved was drilling rig and not commercial sailing vessel. Phillips v Amoco Trinidad Oil Co. (1980, CA9 Cal) 632 F2d 82, cert den 451 US 920, 68 L Ed 2d 312, 101 S Ct 1999.
In case of injury to American seaman, occurring on foreign vessel on high seas, existence and nature of cause of action for alleged wrong is governed by law of country under which vessel is registered. The Oriskany (1933, DC Md) 3 F Supp 805.
One who engages to serve on board foreign ship necessarily undertakes to be bound by law of country to which ship belongs; jurisdiction of laws of flag nation accompany vessel not only over high seas but everywhere else it may be waterborne. Radovcic v The Princ Pavle (1942, DC NY) 45 F Supp 15.
JONES ACT- TABLE OF CONTENTS
|
|

William H. Lawson
Accident Lawyer Hawaii
Century Square
1188 Bishop St. Suite 2902
Honolulu, HI 96813
New client hotline:
(808) 524-5300
Main business phone:
(808) 528-2525
Directions to Accident Lawyer Hawaii

Hawaii accident news and articles
Court cases re: Hawaii accident law
Hawaii Medical Experts- reviews and links
Medical Advances- new treatments & other developments
Important Resources
More Resources
Like our site? Trade links with us!
The Constitution Of The State Of Hawaii
Jones Act- maritime law and seaman cases
Products Liability - Hawaii Cases & Comment
Current Pacific Rim News & Articles
Recent Personal Injury and Car Accident News
In some jurisdictions, courts require a defense medical examiner to produce tax returns as a prerequisite to allowing the witness to testify against an injured claimant. See, eg, Noffke v. Perez, Sup. Ct. of Alaska No. S-12185, 2008 Westlaw 746972 (Alaska, March 21, 2008). This requirement exists because large amounts of income from insurance companies shown on the doctor's 1099's and tax returns shows a reason for bias. Unfortunately, the Hawaii courts and the LIRAB have consistently failed to provide even this minimal protection against often highly biased defense medical examiners purchased by insurance companies. A change of course is needed.
|