|
General Info
What is a Personal Injury Claim? (basic)
Do I Need an Accident Lawyer?
Finding an Accident Lawyer in Hawaii
Get Legal Help at Accident Lawyer Hawaii
Maui, Kauai, Lanai & Big Island Injuries
Preparing a Claim or Case After an Injury
About Accident Lawyer Hawaii- Attorney Wm Lawson
Insurance Coverage for Injuries - Hawaii
Accidents (except MVAs)
Defective products liability - Hawaii
Ocean, boating & maritime accidents - Hawaii
Construction & equipment accidents - Hawaii
Recreational accidents - Hawaii
Electrical accidents - Hawaii
Elevator accidents - Hawaii
Explosion accidents - Hawaii
Insurance Claims and Bad Faith - Hawaii
Medical & professional malpractice - Hawaii
Dog bites, animal attacks - Hawaii
Swimming pool accidents - Hawaii
Fall accidents- Trip, slip, etc. - Hawaii
Types of Injury
Brain & Head Injuries - Hawaii
Spinal Cord Injuries- SCI - Hawaii
Catastrophic injury claims - Hawaii
Wrongful death claims - Hawaii
Broken bone injuries - Hawaii
Burn accidents (Fire or Chemical) - Hawaii
Drowning accidents - Hawaii
Disc | Disk injuries - Hawaii
Motor Vehicle Accidents
Car accidents - Hawaii
Drunk driver accidents - Hawaii
Truck and bus accidents - Hawaii
Moped and pedestrian accidents - Hawaii
Auto claims and insurance - Hawaii
Motorcycle claims & insurance - Hawaii

American Trial Lawyers Association

Consumer Lawyers Hawaii

Stanford Law School

American Bar Association

Marquis' Who's Who in the World, Who's Who in America and Who's Who in American Law
Sister sites:
Accident Lawyer Hawaii Attorney -
Car Accident Lawyer Hawaii -
Injury Lawyer Attorney Hawaii -
|
|
|
Overstated Med Mal Losses
A consumer group which watches the insurance industry has determined that insurance companies pad their losses by 50% or so when reporting them to state regulators - conduct calculated to gain regulatory approval for excessively hiking malpractice premiums. According to the Foundation for Taxpayer and Consumer Rights the claims of the insurance industry that losses from malpractice suits are forcing them to jack up malpractice premiums ignores reality. The losses reported by insurance companies to state regulators to justify rates are actually much larger than the losses paid out. During a 9 year study from 1986 to 1994 the industry reported to regulators losses of $39.6 billion but actually paid only $26.7 billion. The losses were overstated by approximately 50% over the nine year period. (The study examines a period ending 10 years ago because it takes almost a decade to compare losses insurers report to regulators with the amounts actually paid out after malpractice claims have made their way through the court system -- a process that can take nine or 10 years.) About 190 medical malpractice insurance companies sell malpractice insurance and write about $9.4 billion in policies a year. The United States spends about $1.7 trillion on health care annually - so even with the inflated premiums - all malpractice costs are still less than 1% of annual healthcare expenditures. (Dean Starkman, Washington Post, December 29, 2005)
|
|

Accident Lawyer Hawaii
William Lawson, Esq.
Century Square
1188 Bishop St. Suite 2902
Honolulu, HI 96813
New client hotline:
(808) 524-5300
Main business phone:
(808) 528-2525
Directions to Accident Lawyer Hawaii

Hawaii accident news and articles
Court cases re: Hawaii accident law
Hawaii Medical Experts- reviews and links
Medical Advances- new treatments & other developments
Important Resources
More Resources
Like our site? Trade links with us!
The Constitution Of The State Of Hawaii
Jones Act- maritime law and seaman cases
Products Liability - Hawaii Cases & Comment
Current Pacific Rim News & Articles
Recent Personal Injury and Car Accident News
So-called "medical records reviews" by defense medical experts who review medical records but never examine the plaintiff have been found to NOT meet the admissibility requirements of Daubert. A Federal court in Virginia has ruled that a doctor's comments on a patient whom the doctor has never seen (1) evades meaningful testing, (2) eludes peer review, (3) has error rates which are incalculable and (4) fails the test of general acceptability. Diagnoses made simply by reviewing the notes of other doctors and considering tests and procedures which have been performed without the benefit of the patient's own words and a direct physical examination of the patient are simply too unreliable to allow such testimony in court. Hartwell v. Danek Medical, Inc., 47 F. Supp. 2d 703 (W.D. Va. 1999)
|